Ex Parte McDonough’s Empirical Analysis
1915
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently May 2001 · most notably City & County of San Francisco v. Superior Court (1951), Baird v. Koerner (1960)
21 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hager v. Shindler · White v. State · Stanley v. Stanley · State v. Dawson · 44 Tex. Crim. 382 - Holden v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The name of the client will be considered privileged matter where the circumstances of the case are such that the name of the client is material only for the purpose of showing an acknowledgement of guilt on the part of such client of the very offenses on account of which the attorney was employed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.