Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 Cal. 562 - Westcott v. Gilman

Westcott v. Gilman’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
7
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently July 2008 · most notably Campagna v. Market Street Railway Co. (1944), 74 Cal. App. 765 - Wise v. Radis (1925)

4 federal appellate · 45 state decisions

1701915192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hendy v. March · Chapman v. Hughes · County of San Luis Obispo v. Farnum · Smith v. Schultz · Hunter v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * But while thus the element of profit sharing does not alone and of itself establish a partnership, it is an essential element of every partnership, and it is an element present in this contract. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.