¶1This action involves the validity of a deed claimed to have been executed by J. M. Hood in his lifetime to Georgiene Ruth Carey, his granddaughter. The case is essentially similar in its facts and in the law applicable thereto to Rice v. Carey (Sac. No. 2145), ante, p. 748, [151 Pac. 135], just decided. Here, as there, the judgment went in favor of the plaintiffs and the defendant appeals.
¶2For the reasons stated in the decision just referred to, the action of the superior court in the case at bar must be upheld.
¶3The judgment is affirmed.
¶4Shaw, J., Melvin, J., Lorigan, J., Henshaw, J., Lawlor, J., and, Angellotti, C. J., concurred.