Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 CALAPP3D 773 - In Re Jackson

In Re Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2009

9 state decisions

40198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Bridges v. State of California Times-Mirror Co · Sacher v. United States · Smith v. Superior Court · 10 Cal. 3d 237 - In Re Buckley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The attorney in an action or special proceeding may be changed at any time before or after judgment or final determination as follows: . . . ffl] Upon the order of the court, upon the application of either client or attorney, after notice from one to the other.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.