Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

170 F. 1020

Docket No. 264.

Matanzas

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1909.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1909-05-25

<p>Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.</p>

1 counsel of record

Relies on The Matanzas

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1909-05-25

¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

¶2For opinion" below, see 166 Fed. 985.

¶3B,0binson, Biddle & Benedict (W. S. Montgomery, of counsel), for appellant. Wing, Putnam & Burlingham (Charles C. Burlingham, of counsel), for ap-pellee.

¶4Before LACOMBE, COXE, and NOYES, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6There seems to be more than the usual number of contradictions, inconsistencies, and untrustworthy estimates in this record. We are not inclined to reverse the findings of fact or the conclusions of the District Judge who heard all the libelant’s witnesses and the more important ones called by the claimant. Decree affirmed, with costs.

/170/f1d/1020 · .json · Public domain