Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 F.1d 31 - Waskey v. Hammer

Waskey v. Hammer’s Empirical Analysis

170 F. 31 · 1909

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 1954
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Gwillim v. Donnellan · Prosser v. Finn · Wells v. Nickles · United States v. Crusell · McIntosh v. Price

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A location made in good faith and otherwise conformable to law is not rendered wholly void by reason of such excess; but that the excessive area only is void is well settled. And that such locator is at liberty to select the portion of the claim that he will reject as such excess is also established law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.