Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 F.1d 324 - Crier v. Innes

Crier v. Innes’s Empirical Analysis

170 F. 324 · 1909

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
October 1993
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 1993

7 federal appellate · 4 district ·

401909191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Foley v. Pennsylvania R. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Wo think this contention is not well founded. A monument is manufactured, and in our opinion is a ‘manufacture,’ and not — as urged by the defendants — a species of architecture. It comes within the dictionary definition of the former term, and if we go beyond that, and look at trade usage, we find in the present record the defendants’ own witnesses describing themselves as monument ‘manufacturers,’ and speaking of ‘manufacturing’ monuments.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.