In re Maxson’s Empirical Analysis
170 F. 356 · 1909
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 1981
2 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lockwood v. Exchange Bank · Krippendorf v. Hyde · Parsons v. Livingston · Adams v. Beale · Foster v. Rice
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This act shall not affect the allowance to bankrupts of the exemptions .which are prescribed by the state laws in force at the time of the filing of the petition in the state wherein they have had their domicile for the six months or the greater portion thereof immediately preceding the filing of the petition.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brandt v. Mathew““But it cannot be that a failure, through oversight in preparing the schedules, to therein make such claim will deprive the bankrupt of the exemption allowed by the state, when timely application is made to the court of bankruptcy therefor.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Burnham
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.