In re Schachter’s Empirical Analysis
170 F. 683 · 1909
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1932
3 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Dresser & Co. · In re Hanna · In re Haupt Bros.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““No reasonable excuse for this failure to enter an important transaction is assigned by either of the bankrupts, and the court is left to infer intent from what the bankrupts actually did and the motives reasonably to be assigned for their acts.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Sims
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.