Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 F.1d 719 - In re Koronsky

In re Koronsky’s Empirical Analysis

170 F. 719 · 1909

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
June 2011
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2011

4 federal appellate · 5 district ·

60190919101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lyman Spalding v. The People of the State of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Manifestly the offense was one peculiarly against the court, and of the sort where the punishment of the offender is a vindication of the dignity of the court; it does not lose that character because the statute authorizes the court, to turn over the amount of the line when collected to some person pecuniarily aggrieved by the offender’s conduct.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.