Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 F.1d 825 - In re Beachy & Co.

In re Beachy & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

170 F. 825 · 1909

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
September 1977
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 1977

2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

1019091910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Huntington v. Attrill · York Manufacturing Company v. Arthur Cassell J B · Wisconsin v. Pelican Insurance · Merrill v. National Bank of Jacksonville · Hewit v. Berlin Machine Works

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It seems clear, therefore, that this statutory cause of action belongs exclusively to the ■ creditors. It is a secondary security which is not an asset of the estate and does not pass to the trustee. Such a claim may be enforced by the creditor in any court having jurisdiction, quite independently of the bankruptcy proceedings.” -”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.