¶1William A. Thomas, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellant.
¶2Edgar A. Neely, of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.
¶3Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD, and WALLER, Circuit Judges.
¶5Brought and tried under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., the suit resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant.
¶6In addition to the grounds set out in the motion for new trial,1 none of which present matters cognizable 'by us, appellant in his brief and argument complains (1) of questions asked, but not answered, seeking to elicit whether plaintiff had had a venereal disease, and (2) generally that the jury did not give due consideration to the case.
¶7As to the questions asked, it is clear from the record thát no error was committed. It is equally clear that the complaint that the verdict was not the result of due consideration presents nothing for our' review.
¶8No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.