Sugarman v. Pitzer’s Empirical Analysis
170 F.3d 1145 · 1999
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently August 2013
8 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McIntosh v. United States Parole Commission · Ojo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Forde v. U.S. Parole Commission · Ferrante v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Section] 2253 clearly does not encompass challenges to federal detention under 2241. Just as clearly, however, 2253 does encompass challenges to state detention under 2241, since 'the detention complained of arises out of process issued by a State court.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the final order in a proceeding under section 2255”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.