Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 F.3d 1236 - Rich v. Calderon

Rich v. Calderon’s Empirical Analysis

170 F.3d 1236 · 1999

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
March 2011
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2011

3 federal appellate ·

50199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Teague v. Lane · Vasquez v. Hillery · Bracy v. Gramley · Bonin v. Calderon · 11 Cal. 4th 786 - People v. Memro

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “), facing the death penalty following his 1980 convictions for a series of sexual attacks and murders, appeals the denial of his habeas corpus petition. Rich's claims include the district court's denial of discovery and an evidentiary hearing and various errors in the handling of the criminal charges against him in state court -among them pre-indictment and pre-trial publicity, the makeup of the grand jury returning his indictment, the instructions given his trial jury, prejudice from an”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “of interest because of pressures put on him by Shasta County funding authorities. The result of these pressures, Rich claims, was twofold: (1) his counsel was”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Once you've killed, you can always kill again.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.