Jiras v. Pension Plan of Make-up Artist & Hairstylists Local 798 of the Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees’s Empirical Analysis
170 F.3d 162 · 1999
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 2017
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Firestone Tire and Rubber Company v. Bruch · Nowak v. Ironworkers Local 6 Pension Fund · Pagan v. Nynex Pension Plan · Zuckerbrod v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance · Lamontagne v. Pension Plan of United Wire, Metal & Machine Pension Fund
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a]pplying th[e arbitrary and capricious] standard, the court found that Jiras’s minimal evidence supporting his claims about the 1964 and 1965 films failed to create a genuine question of material fact whether the Fund's denial of certain benefits was arbitrary and capricious.”). 48 . Firestone Tire, 489 U.S. at 115 , 109 S.Ct. 948 . 49 . PL 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 7. 50 . Cirulis, 321 F.3d at 1013 (emphasis omitted). 51 . Employee Handbook at 18. 52 . 10/4/02 Affidavit of Gerald E. Grez ¶4 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim, not for lack of jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“dictated by the application of undisputed law to undisputed facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.