United States v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
170 F.3d 431 · 1999
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2018
6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States Touhy v. Ragen · Williams v. State · Boron Oil Co. v. Downie · Smith v. Cromer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the government asserted and [the party requesting information] did not dispute that the United States Attorney's response to a subpoena constitutes final agency action for purposes of the APA.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he proper method for judicial review of the agency's final decision pursuant to its regulations is through the Administrative Procedure Act (`APA').”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“jurisdiction to compel the FBI to produce documents subpoenaed by a defendant in the course of a state criminal prosecution.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.