United States v. Condon’s Empirical Analysis
170 F.3d 687 · 1999
Citation profile
42 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently March 2014 · most notably United States of America v. Willie James Richardson (1999), 22 Cal. 4th 48 - People v. Ervin (2000)
42 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 1 U.S.C. § 1 (Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002) · 28 U.S.C. § 530B · 28 U.S.C. § 994
Relies on Giglio v. United States · United States v. Caceres · Rowland v. California Men's Colony, Unit II Men's Advisory Council · Nardone v. United States · United States v. Murphy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hoever ... directly or indirectly, gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person, for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon a trial ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than two years, or both.” .The Seventh Circuit held that § 201(c)(2)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]hat approach, if taken seriously, would permit prosecutors to pay cash for favorable testimony, a practice that lacks the statutory and historical support of immunity and sentence reduction”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]ll relevant evidence is admissible, except as otherwise provided by the Constitution of the United States, by Act of Congress, by these rules, or by other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court pursuant to statutory authority.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.