Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 F.3d 747 - Robinson v. Page

Robinson v. Page’s Empirical Analysis

170 F.3d 747 · 1999

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 2016
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2016 · most notably Jones v. Bock (2007), Dawes v. Walker (2001)

11 federal appellate · 1 district ·

200199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1997E

Relies on Helling v. McKinney · Siglar II v. Hightower · Davis v. District of Columbia · Zehner v. Trigg · Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. Department of Army of United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]o Federal civil action may be brought ... for mental or emotional injury ... without a prior showing of physical injury.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Id. at 748. Robinson observed that, 43 [t]o go further and dismiss the entire suit because it had one bad claim would be not only gratuitous, but also contrary to the fundamental procedural norm that when a complaint has both good and bad claims ... only the bad claims are dismissed; the complaint as a whole is not. If Congress meant to depart from this norm, we would expect some indication of that, and we find none. 44 Id. at 748-49. We agree with this reasoning and find it fully applicable to § 1997e(a). 45 In sum, the use of the term”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[i]t would be a serious mistake to interpret section 1997e(e) to require a showing of physical injury in all prisoner civil rights suits.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.