Randolph v. Rodgers’s Empirical Analysis
170 F.3d 850 · 1999
Citation profile
56 federal appellate · 15 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 142 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Garcia v. Suny Health Sciences Center of Brooklyn (2001), Robert Foulk v. Ronald Charrier (2001)
56 federal appellate · 15 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3626 (§ 20409 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994) · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 29 U.S.C. § 794 · 42 U.S.C. § 12131 (§ 201 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Spencer v. Kemna · Amoco Production Co. v. Village of Gambell · Alexander v. Choate
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 142 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o otherwise qualified individual with a disability . . . shall . . . be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance . . . .”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The ADA and [ 504 of the] RA are 'similar in substance' and, with the exception of the RA's federal funding requirement, 'cases interpreting either are applicable and interchangeable.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'Abuse of discretion occurs if the district court reaches its conclusions by applying erroneous legal principles or relying on clearly erroneous factual findings.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.