Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 F.3d 980 - Munkus v. Furlong

Munkus v. Furlong’s Empirical Analysis

170 F.3d 980 · 1999

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
7
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 2020

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

1201999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Faretta v. California · Soberon v. United States · McKaskle v. Wiggins · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A defendant’s waiver of his right to counsel is valid only if it is knowing and intelligent; the waiver is knowing and intelligent only if the trial court informs the defendant on the record of the nature of the charges against him, the possible punishments and defenses, and the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “While the right to counsel is in force until waived, the right of self-representation does not attach until asserted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[C]ourts consistently have discussed the right to self-representation in terms of invoking or asserting it”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.