Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

170 F. App'x 833

United States v. Thomas

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 14, 2006

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2006-03-14

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Decided 2006-03-14

¶1ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

¶2Dion Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Thomas, No. CA-04-864-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 27, 2004). We dispense *834with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶3AFFIRMED

/170/fappx/833 · .json · Public domain