Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 FRD 411 - Bobrosky v. Vickers

Bobrosky v. Vickers’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
March 2012
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Allgeier v. United States · Angelo v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. · Huff v. Marine Tank Testing Corp. · Brown Badgett, Inc. v. Jennings · Tatman v. Collins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 29 allows the parties, by written stipulation, to modify the procedures for the taking and use of depositions. Thus, where the parties have agreed in writing, the requirements of Rule 32 may be waived. In this way, depositions of witnesses have in many cases been used at trial in lieu of live testimony. In fact, their admission at trial has so often not even been an issue that in most instances courts review depositions as substantive evidence without mentioning the manner in which they became part of the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.