170 F. Supp. 2d 445 - Ackerley Media Group, Inc. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Mills v. Polar Molecular Corp. · Auten v. Auten · Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc. · International Audiotext Network, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Sharp has not asked the court to enforce the choice of forum clause, and the court declines to transfer this case sua sponte to the district court in Washington.”); Coastal Ref. & Mktg., Inc. v. Callen Corp., 1991 WL 131944 , at n. 4 (S.D.Ala.1991) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.