Jefferson v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2671 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 5 U.S.C. § 2103 · 5 U.S.C. § 2105 · 5 U.S.C. § 2302 · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 701
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]lthough Plaintiff in his Opposition insists that Count II alleges both substantive and procedural due-process violations, the [First] Amended Complaint contains not a single suggestion that Jefferson intended to advance the former.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“reflect[ed] a consistent disregard of federal procurement rules and regulations, federal ethics principles, and the proper stewardship of appropriated dollars.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“do[ ] not apply to interpretive rules, general statements of policy, or rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.