170 F. Supp. 3d 21 - In Re: Navy Chaplaincy’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1558 · 10 U.S.C. § 611 · 10 U.S.C. § 628 · 10 U.S.C. § 632 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000B
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“several of the Navy's alleged policies or practices relating to accession, personnel management, promotions, and career transition,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“culture of bias and hostility toward Non-liturgical chaplains,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“claims alleging ad hoc actions against certain Plaintiffs,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.