170 Ill. App. 3d 828 - People v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently February 2010 · most notably 226 Ill. App. 3d 974 - People v. O'TOOLE (1992), 222 Ill. App. 3d 896 - People v. Manley (1991)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Doyle v. Ohio · Greer v. Miller · Johnson v. Righetti · Anderson v. Charles · Soto v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““where defendant’s exculpatory testimony at trial is manifestly inconsistent with statements made after arrest[; thus] any comment or evidence concerning his failure to give the same statement at that time will not violate the Doyle rule. Anderson v. Charles (1980), 447 U.S. 404, 408 , 65 L. Ed. 2d 222, 226 , 100 S. Ct. 2180, 2182 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Aquino
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.