Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 IND 548 - Lauster v. Meyers

Lauster v. Meyers’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
March 1936
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 1936 · most notably Voss v. Balz (1932), Klotz v. Schellenberger (1913)

27 state decisions

1101908191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whisler v. Whisler · Hunderlock v. Dundee Mortgage & Trust Investment Co. · Smith v. Gustin · Moore v. Ferguson · Garside v. Wolf

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The assignment of errors is the complaint in this court, and only the parties adverse to appellants in the judgment appealed from, over whom jurisdiction is acquired, are those named therein as appellees. If such adverse parties to the appeal are not made appellees in this court, the case cannot be determined upon its merits, because this court has no power to disturb the judgment without disturbing it as to all in whose favor it was rendered, and this court has no jurisdiction to disturb it as to those who are not parties to the appeal.” Lauster v. Meyers (1908), 170 Ind. 548 , 84 N. E. 1087 . (See Rule 6 of Supreme Court; Ewbank, Manual of Practice (2d ed.) §126; Elliott, Appellate Procedure §322; and list of cases cited under §719 Burns 1926.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.