Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 Ind. App. 422 - Terrel v. State

170 Ind. App. 422 - Terrel v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
September 2004
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lipsett Steel Products, Inc. v. Mosley · State v. Gerhardt · McAfee v. State · Sarlls, City Clerk v. State, Ex Rel. · Williams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Any store, shop, warehouse, dwelling house, apartment, building, vehicle, boat, aircraft, or any place whatever, which is used by any person for the purpose of illegally using any controlled substance or which is used for the illegal keeping or selling of the same shall be deemed a common nuisance. No person shall visit such a common nuisance. (b) Any person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be fined not less than twenty-five dollars [$25.00] nor more than one hundred dollars [$100] and may be imprisoned in the county jail for a period of not more than six [6] months. [IC 1971, 35-24.1-4-3.5, as added by Acts 1973, PIL. 335, § 1, p. 1834.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Bass v. State
  2. “Common nuisance (a) A person is guilty of common nuisance if he knowingly visits or maintains a store, warehouse, dwelling, apartment building, vehicle, boat, aircraft or any other place which is used by any person for the purpose of unlawfully using a controlled substance. (b) Common nuisance is a misdemeanor punishable to a determinate term of imprisonment in the county jail of not more than six (6) months and a fine of not less than twenty-five dollars [$25.00] nor more than one hundred dollars [$100].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Bass v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.