Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 La. 680 - Tennent v. Caffery

Tennent v. Caffery’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
3
states following
December 2004
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently December 2004 · most notably Shaw Constructors v. ICF Kaiser Engineers, Inc. (2004), Keller v. Summers (1939)

2 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

6019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Werk v. Leland University · Tennent v. Caffery · Lawler v. Bradford · Lee v. Long · McGee v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a party, before buying, knows of the defect of his own vendor's title, he is not entitled to withhold or suspend the payment of the price, nor demand security against eviction, if he be threatened therewith, on account of such defect.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.