Stevenson v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently December 2021 · most notably Charles Freeland & Sons, Inc. v. Couplin (2001), 40 Md. App. 339 - Subsequent Injury Fund v. Baker (1978)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ireland v. Shipley · Gold Dust Corp. v. Zabawa · Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. v. Simmons · Georgia Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission · Saf-T-Cab Service, Inc. v. Terry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If aggravation, diminution or termination of disability take place or be discovered after the rate of compensation shall have been established or compensation terminated in any case, the Commission may, upon the application of any party in interest or upon its own motion, readjust for future application the rate of compensation in accordance with rules in this section provided, or in a proper case, terminate the payments.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“I think the award is too small, as I am satisfied the earnings of my husband were greater than those given consideration in my claim.... I can show your Commission that the award should be increased[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“took no appeal to the Circuit Court ... within the period of thirty days as provided by law[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.