170 Md. App. 255 - Walker v. Grow’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably J.S. v. C.C. (2009), 174 Md. App. 583 - Gordon v. Gordon (2007)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Unkle v. Unkle · 38 Md. App. 406 - Montgomery County Department of Social Services v. Sanders · Voishan v. Palma · 11 Md. App. 638 - Quinn v. Quinn · 102 Md. App. 212 - Reuter v. Reuter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nlike the present case, expert testimony was offered to the trial court in Walker v [.] Gro[w ] to assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence and to determining a fact in issue. An expert or a witness familiar with the design of the Allegis Plan would have been helpful to this court in determine if [Jeffrey] actually received income from Allegis. This testimony was not presented. .... Considering the fact that Allegis is not an S Corporation, no expert testimony was presented during trial and that this court questions the credibility of [Jeffrey] as it concerns his income, this court is not persuaded to rely on [Jeffrey’s] assertion alone.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Reichert v. Hornbeck“[SJuitable documentation of actual income includes pay stubs, employer statements otherwise admissible under the rules of evidence, or receipts and expenses if self-employed, and copies of each parent’s 3 most recent tax returns.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Reichert v. Hornbeck“testified at trial that the parties had attended 'family therapy,' paid for by her, and that she intend[ed] to have the family in slightly more expensive therapy in the future.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.