Eberle v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
1927
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently June 2001
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State ex rel. Powell v. State Medical Examining Board · Brenner v. Brenner · Arnold & Murdock Co. v. Industrial Commission · State ex rel. Carlson v. District Court of Hennepin County · State ex rel. Husting v. Board of State Canvassers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“as may reasonably be required at the time of the injury, and during the disability for not exceeding ninety (90) days and not exceeding one hundred dollars ($100.00) in value; * * * provided, however, that upon request by the employe made during or after said period of ninety (90) days and necessity being shown therefor, the court may require the above treatment, articles and supplies for the cure and relief from the effects of such injury for such further time and amount as is just under the facts shown.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. Iverson“the amount for which the employer is liable is clearly fixed by the statute at not to exceed the rate of $100 for each 90 days,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. Iverson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.