Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1927-03-18
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1979
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
¶2
On April 8, 1927, the following opinion was filed:
Per Curiam.
¶3
The opinion states that “no claim is made that the evidence does not warrant the verdict.”
1
That statement is erroneous to the extent that both by assignment of error and some argument the sufficiency of the evidence was questioned. However, our consideration of the record led us to the view that there was no reasonable basis for that position. The opinion, in justice to counsel for appellants, should stand corrected accordingly. With this comment, the petition for rehearing is denied.
