Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 MO 284 - Utter v. Sidman

Utter v. Sidman’s Empirical Analysis

1902

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
3
states following
April 1978
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently April 1978 · most notably Charles v. White (1908), Ashbaugh v. Ashbaugh (1918)

37 state decisions

16019021910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barnett v. Barnett · Bone v. Tyrrell · Farrar v. Christy's Administrators · Charles v. Patch · Bean v. Kenmuir

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The intention of the grantor, as gathered from the four corners of the instrument, is now the pole star of construction. That intention may be expressed anywhere in the instrument, and in any words, the simpler and plainer the better, that will impart it, and the court will enforce it no matter in what part of the instrument it is found.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.