Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 Mont. 234 - Baylor v. Jacobson

Baylor v. Jacobson’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently December 2012

20 state decisions

8019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Loudon v. Scott · Collins v. Itoh · Dunn v. Beck · State v. Fellows · Dean v. First National Bank of Great Falls

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not the function of summary judgment to decide that issue but simply to establish whether an issue exists that required determination and resolution at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.