Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 NC 719 - State v. Cooper

State v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
3
states following
September 1990
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 1990

4 state decisions

20191519201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The charge of the court must be considered as a whole, in the same connected way as given to the jury, and upon the presumption that the jury did not overlook any portion of it. If, when so construed, it presents the law fairly and correctly to the jury, there is no ground for reversing the judgment, though some of the expressions, when standing alone, may be regarded as erroneous. Kornegay v. R. R. , 154 N.C. 389 ; S. v. Robertson , 166 N.C. 356 ; S. v. Lance , 149 N.C. 551 ; McNeill v. R. R. , 167 N.C. 390 ; Thompson on Trials, sec. 2407.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.