170 N.C. App. 299 - State v. Hernandez’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
62
cited by 62 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
62 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Whren v. United States · Soberon v. United States · Watson v. United States · Lehman Bros. v. Lilly · Crane v. Stern
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"An appellate court accords great deference to the trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress because the trial court is entrusted with the duty to hear testimony (thereby observing the demeanor of the witnesses) and to weigh and resolve any conflicts in the evidence."”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“A court must consider the totality of the circumstances in determining whether a reasonable suspicion existed”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“General warrants, whereby any officer or other person may be commanded to search suspected places without evidence of the act committed, or to seize any person or persons not named, whose offense is not particularly described and supported by evidence, are dangerous to liberty and shall not be granted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.