In Re K.B.’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 134 Ohio App. 3d 484 - In Re Etter · 123 Ohio App. 3d 448 - In Re Sappington · 119 Ohio App. 3d 201 - In Re Howard · 77 Ohio App. 3d 80 - In Re Adoption of Howell · 160 Ohio App. 3d 159 - In Re Slider
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the absence of an objection does not preclude a reversal due to the juvenile court's failure to appoint a [guardian ad litem] when required under R.C. 2151.281(A)(2) or Juv.R. 4(B)(2)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Morgan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.