Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 OHIOAPP3D 235 - State v. Brown

State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Draper v. United States · California v. Trombetta · Arizona v. Youngblood · 161 Ohio App. 3d 145 - State v. Miller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Ironically, the most significant exculpatory feature of the destroyed evidence is the very fact of its destruction. The state's error in destroying the evidence, which denies the jury an opportunity to see what it actually looks like, preponderates in the defendant's favor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hen evidence is only potentially exculpatory, the destruction of such evidence does not deprive an accused of due process unless the police acted in bad faith when destroying the evidence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “obtained a laboratory report showing that the substance seized from the pocket of [d]efendant's shirt was cocaine”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.