Evanich v. Bridge’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2020
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Grava v. Parkman Township · State v. Saxon · Grace v. Koch · State v. D'Ambrosio · State v. Gillard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“barred from raising this argument on appeal, after remand, by the doctrine of res judicata.” Id. 24 . In Maryland, the original source of the adverse possession doctrine was the Limitation Act of 1623, 21 James I, c. 16, an English statute which required that suits to recover ownership of land by the title holder”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“`Where an argument could have been raised on an initial appeal, res judicata dictates that it is inappropriate to consider that same argument on a second appeal following remand.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.