State v. Litreal’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Bryan-Wollman v. Domonko (2007), State v. Puckett (2010)
48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Olano · State v. Thompkins · State v. Jenks · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'with the utmost caution, under exceptional circumstances and only to prevent a manifest miscarriage of justice.'”
10 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sims · State v. Kendrick“affect[s] `substantial rights,' which the court has interpreted to mean `but for the error, the outcome of the trial clearly would have been otherwise.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.