State v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 2022
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Foster · State v. Muscatello · 52 Ohio App. 2d 70 - State v. Gideons · 155 Ohio App. 3d 535 - Roberts v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance · State v. Henley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and, therefore, the trial court properly instructed the jury on the offense. See id. at ¶ 10-12. {¶ 23} The Davis court appears to have proceeded in its analysis under the erroneous assumption that the state had the burden of establishing sudden passion or a sudden fit of rage as to the voluntary manslaughter conviction. However,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[s]udden passion or a sudden fit of rage occasioned by the victim * * * are circumstances that mitigate culpability, and they are not elements of the crime of voluntary manslaughter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.