Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 OHIOAPP3D 92 - State v. Bruce

State v. Bruce’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

29 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Booker · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Ring v. Arizona · State v. Foster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There exists no ambiguity in the sentencing statutes in Ohio because the Supreme Court of Ohio held that portions of Ohio's felony sentencing framework was unconstitutional and void in State v. Foster, supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “With respect to judicial decisions, fair warning is violated when the judicial interpretation is `unexpected and indefensible by reference to the law which had been expressed prior to the conduct in issue.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Retroactive judicial decision-making is limited by the due process concept of fair warning[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.