Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 OHIOST3D 107 - State v. Drain

State v. Drain’s Empirical Analysis

2022

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Boykin v. Alabama · Hill v. Lockhart · McMann v. Richardson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To demonstrate plain error, an appellant must show (1) that there was an error, (2) that the error was 'plain,' i.e., obvious, and (3) that the error affected the appellant's 'substantial rights,'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'[b]ecause a no-contest or guilty plea involves a waiver of constitutional rights, a defendant's decision to enter [such] a plea must be knowing, intelligent, and voluntary.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's errors, the proceeding's result would have been different.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.