Newblock v. Bowles’s Empirical Analysis
1935
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 2016
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. · McCain v. State Election Board · Foot v. Town of Watonga · Cornell v. McAlister · Glasco v. State Election Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In McCain v. State Election Board et al., 144 Okla. 85 , 289 P. 759, 760 , this court held: ‘The construction which has been placed upon a statute by the officer or governmental department charged with the carrying out of the provisions of the law is to be accorded due consideration by the courts in construing the statute.’ To the same effect is the holding of this court in Leininger et al. v. Ward-Beekman & Brooks, Inc., 139 Okla. 292 , 282 P. 467 ; Glasco v. State Election Board et al., 121 Okla. 119 , 248 P. 642 ; Foot et al. v. Town of Watonga, 37 Okla. 43 , 130 P. 597 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.