Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 P3D 24 - State v. Varnell

State v. Varnell’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently September 2023

22 state decisions

160200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Benton v. Maryland · Bell v. United States · State v. Adel · State v. Tili · State v. Bobic

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he first step is to analyze the statute in question. Next, we review the statute’s history. Finally, we perform a factual analysis as to the unit of prosecution because even where the legislature has expressed its view on the unit of prosecution, the facts in a particular case may reveal more than one “unit of prosecution” is present.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he number of victims is secondary to the statutory aim.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A person is guilty of criminal solicitation when, with intent to promote or facilitate the commission of a crime, he offers to give or gives money or other thing of value to another to engage in specific conduct which would constitute such crime or which would establish complicity of such other person in its commission or attempted commission had such crime been attempted or committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.