Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 SO3D 802 - Chace v. Loisel

Chace v. Loisel’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 596 So. 2d 665 - Pardo v. State · 497 So. 2d 240 - Fischer v. Knuck · 110 So. 3d 419 - Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Douglas · Domville v. State · Santa Catalina Townhomes, Inc. v. Mirza

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A number of words or phrases could more aptly describe the concept, including acquaintance and, sometimes, virtual stranger. A Facebook friendship does not necessarily signify the existence of a close relationship. Other than the public nature of the internet, there is no difference between a Facebook “friend” and any other friendship a judge might have. Domville’s logic would require disqualification in cases involving an acquaintance of a judge. Particularly in smaller counties, where everyone in the legal commu nity knows each other, this requirement is unworkable and unnecessary. Requiring disqualification in such cases does not reflect the true nature of a Facebook friendship and casts a large net in an effort to catch a minnow.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If the grounds asserted in a motion for disqualification are legally sufficient to create a well-founded fear in the mind of a party that he or she will not receive a fair trial, it is incumbent upon a judge to disqualify herself. To determine whether the motion is “legally sufficient,” this Court must resolve whether the alleged facts, which, accepted as true, would prompt a reasonably prudent person to fear that she could not get a fair and impartial trial before that judge. An affiant’s mere subjective fear is insufficient to form the basis for disqualification.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “casts a large net in an effort to catch a minnow.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.