170 So. 3d 849 - Dravis v. Dravis’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 973 So. 2d 580 - Roth v. Roth · 761 So. 2d 406 - Belmont v. Belmont · 632 So. 2d 207 - Romano v. Romano · King v. State · Cooper v. Cooper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We review the trial court's equitable distribution decisions for abuse of discretion and examine its valuation of marital assets to determine whether it is supported by competent, substantial evidence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“We review a trial court's characterization of an asset as marital or nonmarital de novo and any factual findings necessary to make this legal conclusion for competent, substantial evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Nonmarital assets may lose their nonmarital character and become marital assets where, as here, they have been commingled with marital assets.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.