Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 S.W.3d 111 - Halprin v. State

Halprin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 283rd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Liteky v. United States · Tennessee v. Middlebrooks · Leday v. State · Johnson v. State · Cooks v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The] wide range of punishment recognizes the wide range of circumstances that murder can be committed under. Maybe a situation where I turn to Mr. D'Amore, I don’t like his tie today, and I shoot him ten times in the head, and, you know, he falls down and, you know, I dance around all happy about it. It’s a brutal, heinous, intentional murder.... [I]t could be something like that, that's an intentional murder. Or it could be an aged spouse, okay, who pulls the life support plug—”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “was quiet and never exhibited leadership qualities. Was consistently worried about whether his work was acceptable to the civilian workers. Very submissive characteristic. This worrisome attitude was seen to escalate a month before the escape. One civilian worker speculated whether [Halprin] was undergoing some type of depression.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “testified at length that he was a follower and not a leader and that his participation in the victim's murder was minimal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.