Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 170 S.W.3d 310 - Mills v. Commonwealth

Mills v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · North Carolina v. Alford · McMann v. Richardson · Liteky et al United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “vague allegations ... do not warrant an evidentiary hearing and warrant summary dismissal of the RCr 11.42 motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.